zlacker

[return to "Queen Elizabeth II has died"]
1. kypro+Ph[view] [source] 2022-09-08 18:34:03
>>xd+(OP)
As a Brit I'm not a huge fan of the royal family on principle, but Queen Elizabeth has been such an excellent head of state for us you really can't fault her.

People like to make out her life was easy and that it's not fair that she inherited such a privileged position, but I think the exact opposite. Her life seemed like living hell to me. Every day for the last 70 years she's had to serve this largely ungrateful country, and she did so without complaint. Even in her 90s she took her duties extremely seriously, and I respect the hell out of her for that.

It was only a couple of days ago she invited our new PM to Balmoral Castle to form a government. She was clearly looking weak and it's been no secret that she's been struggling to fulfil her duties as Queen for a while, but even just two days before her death at the age of 96 she put on the performance that was expected of her. And she did this practically every day of her life.

RIP. I doubt anyone will ever live up to her legacy. Despite all the problems I have with the royal family, I couldn't feel more pride that she was our Queen.

◧◩
2. gnulin+Yy[view] [source] 2022-09-08 19:43:34
>>kypro+Ph
> People like to make out her life was easy and that it's not fair that she inherited such a privileged position, but I think the exact opposite. Her life seemed like living hell to me. Every day for the last 70 years she's had to serve this largely ungrateful country, and she did so without complaint. Even in her 90s she took her duties extremely seriously, and I respect the hell out of her for that.

She wasn't doing it from the kindness of her heart. This was her job, she was obscenely rich off of taxpayer money and she could retire any second she wanted to. You make it sound like she was sentenced to sign paperwork for her entire life, when the reality is she consciously chose to do so every day and in exchange she and her family was granted an immense wealth. It's not even remotely something that would warrant complaint. I'm not saying this to be snarky, just pointing out that although maybe parts of her job was boring, stressful, and unfulfilling, this is what she signed up for. And her "compensation" was unimaginable amount of money and power in the form of interpersonal relations.

◧◩◪
3. clpm4j+hA[view] [source] 2022-09-08 19:50:03
>>gnulin+Yy
She didn't really "sign up" for it though. She was born into it in 1926. It's not like 2022 where she could've said "yeah, not for me, I'm moving to Santa Barbara". I don't see how she had any choice but to do what she did, and by all accounts she did it well.
◧◩◪◨
4. pvg+BB[view] [source] 2022-09-08 19:55:57
>>clpm4j+hA
It's not like 2022 where she could've said "yeah, not for me, I'm moving to Santa Barbara".

Plenty of monarchs have done just that including her very own uncle.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. highwa+nE[view] [source] 2022-09-08 20:07:32
>>pvg+BB
Which begs the question of why they’re all moving to Santa Barbara. It must be lovely.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. selimt+2K[view] [source] 2022-09-08 20:32:14
>>highwa+nE
Maybe they like Welsh experimental rock music?
[go to top]