zlacker

>>xd+(OP)
I really feel that Charles should at least consider passing on the Crown to his son William. William and Kate are immensely popular. It would be a good thing for Great Britain, British people as well as for the Royal Family. Charles and Camilla are the opposite in terms of respect and popularity to William and Kate, as far as I understand. If Charles does that, he would write himself into the annals of British history. I am not from GB, so I may be misreading the situation.

>>g42gre+U9
It wouldn't leave any safety margin though. The line of succession after William is a disaster.

>>OscarC+Km
> The line of succession after William is a disaster.

Isn't it without a doubt that Prince George is next in line? It would take quite a lot to displace him.

>>zokier+nq
When the new monarch is too young the next suitable person in the line of succession is appointed Regent. But William's kids are too young, Harry doesn't want it, his kids are also too young, and Andrew is a pervert.

So it would go all the way to Beatrice at number nine on the list. Most people don't even know who she is, so I think they'd probably call it quits.