Here's my personal take: No one is forced to use remote attestation merely to use their device. It's only if you want to use some other service. So - if you don't want to play by the requirements of the service, then just don't use the service? It seems pretty simple. There's a country club that I want to eat in, but they require me to wear a suit jacket. I don't want to wear a suit jacket - so what do I do? Simply not eat at that country club and go get food somewhere else that doesn't require a suit jacket, or do I start a PR campaign about how evil suit jackets are, and call anyone who doesn't mind wearing a suit jacket a shill for Big Golf?
Completely and utterly disingenuously wrong. Safetynet is already required for most banks, and this will be followed by medical and government services and all forms of media.
This free market 'vote with your wallet' bullcrap only works if there's an alternative to vote for.
And what happens when all the physical branches within 100s of km of you shut down because 'online is so convenient' or your doctor starts using an app that requires it, or it's mandatory to do your university exam or log into your government's tax portal or the next covid where you need it to enter a shop?
Or what about when every piece of hardware you can buy has a locked bootloader, or your local phone providers decide to require using their app that puts ads on your lock screen?
Or your local taxis get price dumped out of business by uber which requires it?