zlacker

>>gjsman+(OP)
The thing I fear the most with this is "proof that secure boot has never been disabled". This is just a way to brick your device from accessing services.

What if you government's tax service requires such proof? Or bank? I cannot count how many machines I booted on Linux to rescue a hard drive, or image it, or wipe it, or just to install linux on them. All those devices, boom, paperweight for regular personal use.

I hate it so much that Microsoft is alone in this. It's not because it's M$, it's because they're alone on it.

>>tuetuo+CI1
You get two devices.

>>crypto+2S2
And more e-waste? Thanks but no thanks, I already have enough paperweights.