zlacker

[return to "The Dangers of Microsoft Pluton"]
1. Gh0stR+eg[view] [source] 2022-07-26 06:26:56
>>gjsman+(OP)
I'm completely missing how his example of a Word document that can only be opened by approved users on approved hardware within the corporation is supposed to be a bad thing.

Honestly, that sounds pretty fantastic. I've been using 3rd party tools/extensions to do this sort of thing in corporate and government environments for years, but having the attestation go all the way down to the hardware level is a big value-add, especially with so much ransomware/spyware/extortion/espionage going on these days.

Can someone please explain to me how the author might see this level of security as a bad thing?

◧◩
2. ftyhbh+Ih[view] [source] 2022-07-26 06:39:43
>>Gh0stR+eg
What you can install on YOUR pc will be at the sole mercy of microsoft/or maybe someone else.... That's the cusp of it. Not that it can be used for good, but that it sets the way for heavy misuse by large corporations.

Wait a few years. Smaller companies won't even be allowed to order high end cpu's. You'll be at 100% mercy of these corporations.

If after 2 years they decide to brick your pc, they'll just do it. You think government will help you out here? Lol...

◧◩◪
3. eertve+qj[view] [source] 2022-07-26 06:59:09
>>ftyhbh+Ih
still waiting on the secure boot lockdown everyone has insisted is coming for the better part of two decades...
◧◩◪◨
4. worldo+Sq[view] [source] 2022-07-26 08:19:24
>>eertve+qj
I'm pretty sure some Windows 10 tablets from 2014 to 2016 are locked down to only allow Windows on them (Not S-mode).
[go to top]