zlacker

[return to "The Dangers of Microsoft Pluton"]
1. Gh0stR+eg[view] [source] 2022-07-26 06:26:56
>>gjsman+(OP)
I'm completely missing how his example of a Word document that can only be opened by approved users on approved hardware within the corporation is supposed to be a bad thing.

Honestly, that sounds pretty fantastic. I've been using 3rd party tools/extensions to do this sort of thing in corporate and government environments for years, but having the attestation go all the way down to the hardware level is a big value-add, especially with so much ransomware/spyware/extortion/espionage going on these days.

Can someone please explain to me how the author might see this level of security as a bad thing?

◧◩
2. squiff+qi[view] [source] 2022-07-26 06:47:34
>>Gh0stR+eg
Sure it's fantastic in a corporate environment. Not so fantastic for personal devices. Basically this: https://youtu.be/XgFbqSYdNK4
◧◩◪
3. nine_k+8p[view] [source] 2022-07-26 08:02:23
>>squiff+qi
Well, don't put that on a personal device.

It's like your company giving you serious protecting gear to wear while doing your work on a nuclear reactor is a good thing. But having to wear such gear at home is not a popular choice, and should not be required.

[go to top]