zlacker

[return to "Apple Could Kill CAPTCHAs with Private Access Tokens"]
1. kgwxd+a1[view] [source] 2022-06-15 10:59:57
>>matthe+(OP)
Terrible idea. No matter how much time it would save me, I do not want “my” computer doing any work designed to snitch on me.
◧◩
2. dewell+G1[view] [source] 2022-06-15 11:04:38
>>kgwxd+a1
This protocol is designed to not send any data that can be used to identify you directly or fingerprint your identity.
◧◩◪
3. wewxjf+X2[view] [source] 2022-06-15 11:16:58
>>dewell+G1
It's designed to gatekeep access to the Internet. This is a company's solution to a problem caused by the same company and we are all forced to participate.
◧◩◪◨
4. lotsof+F4[view] [source] 2022-06-15 11:31:25
>>wewxjf+X2
As far as I understand, the problem is caused by massive networks of malware ridden computers and bots.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kgwxd+M9[view] [source] 2022-06-15 12:13:24
>>lotsof+F4
The problem is caused by other peoples reactions to computers and bots. Bots are the servers problem, not mine, my machine should not be involved in solving it. Same reason I block ad/tracking scripts, it's no my responsibility to ensure other peoples advertising contracts are upheld, that's their problem, if they can't solve it without involving me, too bad.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. lotsof+Ti[view] [source] 2022-06-15 13:12:02
>>kgwxd+M9
My comment was to point out what I think was an incorrect characterization in these words:

> company's solution to a problem caused by the same company

The “company” needed a solution to a problem caused by bad actors in the network.

Whether or not a company’s solution causes someone else to have a problem is a different matter.

[go to top]