zlacker

>>kevema+(OP)
Interesting and cool technology - but I can't seem to ignore that every high-quality AI art application is always closed, and I don't seem to buy the ethics excuse for that. The same was said for GPT, yet I see nothing but creativity coming out from its users nowadays.

>>davikr+ed
Granted that's a selection bias: you likely won't hear about the cases where legit obscene output occurs. (the only notable case I've heard is the AI Dungeon incident)

>>minima+Vh
What is the AI dungeon incident?

>>toxicF+LA
https://www.vice.com/en/article/93ywpp/text-adventure-game-c...

TL;DR generative story site creators employ human moderation after horny people inevitably use site to make gross porn; horny people using site to make regular porn justifiably freaked out

Bring your popcorn

>>leland+UB
I always felt like the AI Dungeon response is absurdly stupid. Yeah, erotic text involving minors is not exactly something you want to be associated with, but I've heard that one of their approaches to avoiding it was to ban numbers below 18. That's... not worth it.

I feel like it would've been more than reasonable for them to have taken the position that the AI might output something distasteful, and implement a filter for people who were afraid of it.