zlacker

[return to "We’re discontinuing the Stablegains service"]
1. jmyeet+hg[view] [source] 2022-05-21 22:31:40
>>mkeete+(OP)
What's funny about this is that I can recall discussions here and elsewhere from only a few months ago questioning the "guaranteed" super-high returns. I forget who said this but someone awhile ago said in finance said that if someone is promising you consistent above-market returns it's either a scam or there is unknown or undisclosed risk.

And the Crypto Andys were all like "you just don't understand DeFi!" to which the retort is "No, you just don't understand finance".

Finance is the way it is for many reasons. There are thousands of years of lessons that have made the system the way it is. I get the innovator mentality of sweeping away the old but there seems to be a fine line between innovation and ignorance.

I'm just sitting on the sidelines watching people relearn all the lessons of finance the hard way, some because they think they understand finance because because they understand merkle trees and consensus protocols but really most just want to get rich quick.

◧◩
2. koheri+Aj[view] [source] 2022-05-21 22:50:44
>>jmyeet+hg
What most people don't understand about finance is that there are fundamental rules that you really cannot break without consequences.

Anyone who has studied quantitative finance knows that it is a HARD science. I worked with a Nobel prize winner in economics, and the math dominated. There was no politics, no opinions, no ethics involved. It really is a science.

Most social media characterize finance as some ethical vice or organized political power structure - and those people simply don't understand finance.

Talking to people who are looking to just tear down modern finance are no different than climate change deniers, antivax, or flat earthers... and yes, they even exist in crypto (and on HN).

◧◩◪
3. arinle+641[view] [source] 2022-05-22 07:20:14
>>koheri+Aj
> Anyone who has studied quantitative finance knows that it is a HARD science. I worked with a Nobel prize winner in economics, and the math dominated. There was no politics, no opinions, no ethics involved. It really is a science.

Your comment makes no sense. Just because there's modeling involved that does not make it a hard science. A hard science requires stuff like the ability to perform controlled experiments and replicability, in order to arrive at a high degree of accuracy in predictions.

Throwing around partial differential equations does not turn something into a hard science. You need to meet way more requirements before you're in a position to claim that.

◧◩◪◨
4. ramchi+Pc1[view] [source] 2022-05-22 09:14:24
>>arinle+641
It doesn't necessarily invalidate your point, but I would say astrophysics is a hard science, and yet a ton of it is based on observation and modeling of events we can't control or reproduce.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. progru+er1[view] [source] 2022-05-22 11:58:12
>>ramchi+Pc1
I don’t think astrophysics is a hard science anymore.
[go to top]