zlacker

[return to "Librem 5: First Impressions"]
1. SkyMar+Me[view] [source] 2022-03-22 01:18:47
>>jstanl+(OP)
> The battery life seems short. I'm pretty sure that I charged it up to 99% when I plugged it in this afternoon. It's now 10pm and I just went to check something in Firefox and found that the battery has died already. And I haven't exactly been using it heavily. It's possible that I misunderstood how much I had charged it, but so far this is a bad sign.

Battery life is an area that may be difficult for smaller phone makers to compete on. I think Apple especially puts a ton of engineering effort and coordination into making iOS and their apps work efficiently with their hardware, reducing complexity, runtime cycles, and power consumption as much as possible, on top of already highly-efficient ARM hardware.

Over years of doing that (kaizen), the result is optimized hardware/software fusion with industry-leading battery life. But it seems like it takes a non-trivial amount of additional engineering time and effort to accomplish this, that will be difficult to match by smaller mobile tech startups.

I hope the open source community around Librem and Pine will be able to replicate that effort, but I'm not sure this kind of consistent incremental upgrade work is attractive enough to volunteer FOSS developers. And being maximally effective at it most certainly requires the parent company to coordinate the effort across hardware, software, internal teams, and external volunteers.

◧◩
2. j1elo+Ti[view] [source] 2022-03-22 02:08:57
>>SkyMar+Me
I hope he posts an update saying that the battery charge was a mistake and it had been at 49% not 99%. Otherwise, not even reaching 12 mere hours of battery life is... let's leave it at underwhelming
◧◩◪
3. kop316+lj[view] [source] 2022-03-22 02:14:09
>>j1elo+Ti
No, that is likely not a mistake. The battery life on my Librem 5 is ~8 hours for me on standby with the Modem/Wifi on, I can probably get a bit longer without wifi on. With moderate usage, I would say it drops to ~5-6 hours? But I haven't done any rigorous testing to tell you exact numbers.

Since I am usually either at home or at work, it isn't far away from a charger so battery life isn't a huge deal for me.

◧◩◪◨
4. p1neco+rk[view] [source] 2022-03-22 02:28:34
>>kop316+lj
This is pretty awful if true. I've been through a fair number of mid-priced android phones (I'm more of a buy what's good enough and replace every couple of years for fun guy than a flagship phone guy), and I don't recall /any/ of them lasting for less than ~24 hrs on mostly standby/light usage. Obviously battery life drops a fair bit if you play a bunch of games or stream video or whatever though.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kaba0+VP[view] [source] 2022-03-22 09:13:51
>>p1neco+rk
Is that really that surprising? Android is heavily modified OS, with plenty of engineer hours poured into it, hell, even the kernel is patched to better fit its niche.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. p1neco+vv2[view] [source] 2022-03-22 19:41:52
>>kaba0+VP
My surpise isn't directed at Android, it's at Purism for releasing a product with such poor battery life.
[go to top]