zlacker

[return to "The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News (2019)"]
1. optima+t7[view] [source] 2022-02-17 16:00:30
>>nicola+(OP)
I've noticed that all the online spaces I enjoy visiting are heavily moderated. Whenever I get linked to "free speech" loosely-moderated platforms, I usually hit the back button pretty quick.
◧◩
2. jl2718+xa[view] [source] 2022-02-17 16:13:37
>>optima+t7
Do you seek the truth unconditionally, or only truth that fits within your pre-conceived notions of acceptability? Can you imagine a society where an objective truth was unacceptable, and denial of that truth was harmful to themselves or others?
◧◩◪
3. cogman+2c[view] [source] 2022-02-17 16:20:14
>>jl2718+xa
To be frank, often when I see this glossy pamphlet cover for free speech, you open up the pamphlet and see a bunch of child porn, antisemitism and/or racism.

The issue with free speech platforms is they attract a crowd of people whose only narrative is one that can't be said in other places. It isn't a narrative of truth, it is one of hate and bigotry.

I've seen few examples where objective truth is banned. I have, however, seen a lot of Nazis get banned.

◧◩◪◨
4. zionic+Cl[view] [source] 2022-02-17 16:55:30
>>cogman+2c
That’s just a flaw in your brain’s logical processing.

I’ve seen this again and again, people will see an ocean of normal content anywhere free speech is allowed and laser-focus on the single floating turd.

They’ll then mischaracterize the entire ocean as the turd, it’s like they have no sense of proportionality.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. cogman+pm[view] [source] 2022-02-17 16:58:32
>>zionic+Cl
Name a free speech platform where I'm not going to find the turd on the front page at this very moment.

I'm happy to be shown to be wrong, but from my experience what you are saying doesn't exist.

[go to top]