zlacker

[return to "Feds arrest couple, seize $3.6B in hacked Bitcoin funds"]
1. Alexan+Ub[view] [source] 2022-02-08 17:35:40
>>mikeyo+(OP)
> “After the execution of court-authorized search warrants of online accounts controlled by Lichtenstein and Morgan, special agents obtained access to files within an online account controlled by Lichtenstein,” the press release said. “Those files contained the private keys required to access the digital wallet that directly received the funds stolen from Bitfinex, and allowed special agents to lawfully seize and recover more than 94,000 bitcoin that had been stolen from Bitfinex. The recovered bitcoin was valued at over $3.6 billion at the time of seizure.”

So most likely,

1) they didn't launder it properly, leading to police being able to trace it to their bank accounts. I wonder if tornado.cash was used.

2) then police had their names, leading to warrants for all online accounts - google account, apple account, etc.

3) they made the big blunder of keeping their private keys in their online account. Most likely a txt file in google drive. That is such a silly blunder. Without the private keys, the police has zero proof of anything. They could have made a hundred excuses for how they got money in their bank account, as long as the police didn't have the private keys. Who keeps their private keys in an online account?

Apparently the biggest criminals make too many silly mistakes. The old saying applies here: "you don't have to be smart, just don't be an idiot"

◧◩
2. paulpa+Gp[view] [source] 2022-02-08 18:28:48
>>Alexan+Ub
3) they made the big blunder of keeping their private keys in their online account. Most likely a txt file in google drive. That is such a silly blunder. Without the private keys, the police has zero proof of anything. They could have made a hundred excuses for how they got money in their bank account, as long as the police didn't have the private keys. Who keeps their private keys in an online account?

Not necessarily. If they can spend stolen $, presumably that may be enough to persuade a jury they own it.

◧◩◪
3. Alexan+3r[view] [source] 2022-02-08 18:35:22
>>paulpa+Gp
I agee. Also, intimidation tactics can work here - e.g. telling them they might go to prison for life bec justice wants to make an example out of them.
[go to top]