zlacker

[return to "Nuanced communication usually doesn't work at scale"]
1. smarx0+hv[view] [source] 2022-01-29 20:21:20
>>tagoll+(OP)
Au contraire, academia has worked out how to reliably communicate at scale: publishing peer-reviewed articles in journals.
◧◩
2. qznc+3L[view] [source] 2022-01-29 22:00:37
>>smarx0+hv
Are you talking about the academia where everybody complains that people only read the abstracts?
◧◩◪
3. smarx0+HU[view] [source] 2022-01-29 23:12:54
>>qznc+3L
Which scientific journal are those complaints published in? (:
◧◩◪◨
4. qznc+rY6[view] [source] 2022-01-31 21:41:10
>>smarx0+HU
Spent a few minutes searching. Didn't find complaints but there are publications around this topic:

> When conducting a systematic literature review, researchers usually determine the relevance of primary studies on the basis of the title and abstract. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-008-9075-7

> Results showed that abstract readability is significantly related to the online attention RAs receive https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-04112-9

[go to top]