zlacker

>>foodst+(OP)
The fearmongering about Pluton feels very similar to the criticism that was levied against UEFI Secure Boot when it was being debuted. In the end, x86 systems didn't become any more locked down.

I predict that this will blow over, and won't be a big deal in a few years time once FOSS drivers for what is effectively just a new breed of TPM are released.

If in five years, it turns out I was wrong, I'll eat my hat. Although defining "my hat" by then might be difficult, as it'll probably be subscription based.

>>messe+sa
MS literally has to sign and approve the bootloaders from any distribution, or you basically risk your distribution not booting on a majority of x86 systems. And there is always the push by MS to make these bootloaders as restrictive as possible, to prevent the situation where you use one of them to boot some software that will break Windows' FDE. So as a result we end up with e.g. automatic lockdown mode in Linux when booted from a secure boot system.

How did x86 not become more locked down as a consequence of this?

You can disable all of it (on some devices only!) but the war is already lost: most people are not going to do it, so distros have to pass through these hoops.