zlacker

>>Clumsy+(OP)
Meanwhile we have hundreds of videos of a man being brutally chopped off his hand, hung upside down while he bleeds, then legs chopped off and finally dies gasping all over Twitter and Facebook, for anyone to see, even kids who stumble upon it. Apparently such content doesn't harm users as much as some Renaissance nudes.

>>Santos+yb
Yea I never understood why there's such a crusade to go after people with pictures of nude children on their phones/computers but no one seems to give a shit about someone who collects footage of people (children included!) being brutally tortured and murdered...if we're assembling lists of people we don't like I feel like that should also make the list.

>>jliptz+3l
First, in order to produce child porn you have to abuse real child. At least that is what I think you talk about.

Second, who exactly is cool with collection of child torture videos? Or collection of murders? Because when I came across discussion about such finding, the consensus was that people were horrified, scared, seen it as red flag and seeked to classify kid ones as child port (and hence call authoritirs). It was on reddit.

>>watwut+rv
I think we all agree that media involving children always forces strong reactions, no matter if it is violence or porn. But I'd guess it would create less of a ruckus if a video showing an adult being beheaded is discovered on a child's phone than an adult porn video. People would get upset about the former and the child's environment would be investigated, but it won't necessarily lead to a scandal with news coverage, criminal investigations and resignation of the school principal.