zlacker

[return to "IoT hacking and rickrolling my high school district"]
1. belval+j2[view] [source] 2021-10-12 19:50:56
>>revico+(OP)
The fact that the administration didn't choose to sue them to oblivion is refreshing. I hope we'll see a trend in the future of educator being smart enough to admit that they made a mistake and to encourage the students to develop their talent.

One can only hope.

◧◩
2. _wldu+s3[view] [source] 2021-10-12 19:57:24
>>belval+j2
Being a minor probably helps. There are so many laws today. It's too risky to do this. It's not like it was 25 years ago.
◧◩◪
3. judge2+V5[view] [source] 2021-10-12 20:10:21
>>_wldu+s3
It can get pretty messy. For example, they could wait until they're 21 to try them as an adult, even if it was committed at 17 or younger [0 p. 128]:

> a person who committed the offense before his eighteenth birthday, but is over twenty-one on the date formal charges are filed, may be prosecuted as an adult.... This is true even where the government could have charged the juvenile prior to his twenty-first birthday, but did not.

However, the statute of limitations for CFAA violations is 2 years [1 p. 2] so this might not apply. If somehow they can still go after him at 21, this post could play a part in evidence for performing the hack (I truly hope not).

0: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/l...

1: https://www.goodwinlaw.com/-/media/files/publications/10_01-...

◧◩◪◨
4. giantg+57[view] [source] 2021-10-12 20:16:40
>>judge2+V5
The newest policy is to charge minors as adults unless there's a compelling and beneficial reason not to. I think that was a DOJ change around 2009. Not sure how many states followed suit. But in general, its increasingly likely that minors are being charged as adults.
[go to top]