zlacker

[return to "Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research"]
1. twobit+Z51[view] [source] 2021-09-24 22:49:07
>>BellLa+(OP)
Daczak serves on the WHO team to investigate the virus origins, but this did not get mentioned in any reports. Instead he warns other not to discuss it. He does not include notes that research was done on modifying bat viruses to make them infectious to human cells. These behaviors look like a guilty person, do they not?

The wuhan and eco-health researchers had already started work on the furin cleavage sites and why would they stop when DARPA blocked it? Funding can’t only come from the US. Did CCP also block this research?

> there is published evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was already engaged in some of the genetic engineering work described in the proposal and that viruses designed in North Carolina could easily be used in China.

◧◩
2. kyrra+1z1[view] [source] 2021-09-25 04:08:01
>>twobit+Z51
Peter Daszak was also one of the people organizing the letter in the lancet back in 2020 denying that it came from a lab.

Original letter: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Lancet responding to criticism: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

◧◩◪
3. noptd+N13[view] [source] 2021-09-25 20:46:13
>>kyrra+1z1
Yeah, turns out 26 of the 27 scientists all had some conflict of interest related to the Wuhan lab:

>All but one scientist who penned a letter in The Lancet dismissing the possibility that coronavirus could have come from a lab in Wuhan were linked to its Chinese researchers, their colleagues or funders, a Telegraph investigation can reveal.

Source: https://archive.ph/dXc0n

◧◩◪◨
4. taylod+zbd[view] [source] 2021-09-29 15:35:42
>>noptd+N13
Think about what you're actually saying: most of the world's coronavirus experts have some kind of link to one of the world's leading laboratories' researchers, colleagues, or funders. Would you expect anything else?

Suppose something strange happened and there were suspicions that it was CERN that was involved. Now a letter gets penned by the world's top particle physicists saying it's highly unlikely that the experiments at CERN would be involved. What do you suppose the likelihood would be that those particle physicists would have links to the researchers, colleagues or funders of CERN?

[go to top]