zlacker

[return to "Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research"]
1. missin+H81[view] [source] 2021-09-24 23:10:23
>>BellLa+(OP)
Check out this prescient article from 2017, when the ban was lifted:

Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic...

Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist who directs the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard School of Public Health, called review panels “a small step forward.”

Recent disease-enhancing experiments, he said, “have given us some modest scientific knowledge and done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic.”

Therefore, he said, he hoped the panels would turn down such work.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih...

◧◩
2. tootie+6b1[view] [source] 2021-09-24 23:34:48
>>missin+H81
Prescient how? This article is about a rejected proposal. Not only did the research not happen, we have no reason to believe this type of research caused the pandemic.
◧◩◪
3. echelo+fb1[view] [source] 2021-09-24 23:36:29
>>tootie+6b1
There's more evidence for this type or research happening where the pandemic arose than there is for natural origin.
◧◩◪◨
4. tootie+4c1[view] [source] 2021-09-24 23:44:30
>>echelo+fb1
There's some evidence this kind of research happens. There's not really evidence it was happening in Wuhan nor evidence that the virus we have is the result of experimentation. Historically lab leaks are vanishingly rare and acquisition from animals is extremely common. For lab leak to be even a plausible story the evidence would have to be very strong and it is nowhere near convincing right now.
[go to top]