zlacker

[return to "Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research"]
1. recurs+06[view] [source] 2021-09-24 16:42:15
>>BellLa+(OP)
if you called someone crazy at some point for suggesting this as a possibility, it is time to pause and reflect
◧◩
2. WarOnP+K8[view] [source] 2021-09-24 16:56:18
>>recurs+06
It is reasonable & responsible to downplay theories that get constructed in absence of sufficient and meaningfully qualified evidence.
◧◩◪
3. iammis+8Y[view] [source] 2021-09-24 21:43:34
>>WarOnP+K8
Such as the theory, presented often without evidence, that Sars-Cov-2 came from an imaginary population of bats in Wuhan?
◧◩◪◨
4. tshadd+p11[view] [source] 2021-09-24 22:08:57
>>iammis+8Y
I mean, if it's a random comment on the Internet that makes a claim without presenting evidence, yet evidence does exist and is readily available, I don't have much of a problem with that. After all, you just made the claim that the theory is often present without evidence without actually presenting evidence of that claim. The real question is what evidence exists, not what evidence may or may not be presented with every online comment you may come across.
[go to top]