Which I mean, my wife believes that the government using the threat of violence to collect taxes is immoral, unethical, and that all transactions between all individuals should be voluntary and nonviolent. Which in terms of popular discourse, is very "extreme". She was thinking about running for local public office an a platform of "the government will not take away your propery for failure to pay taxes" which a surprising number of local people on Facebook supported. She's been going to Meetups and having people say "oh yeah I saw your meme, the government sucks, keep it up!" She bugs local politicans on Facebook, their ads keep popping up in her feed, so she'll ask them things like "do you think it's moral to seize someone's property when they can't pay their taxes?" which of course gets bullshit nonanswers from politicians. Nobody wants to say "I think it's moral to seize someone's house because they're behind on taxes".
An authoritarian government wouldn't like someone like my wife, and they certainly wouldn't want her getting likes on Facebook. After all, what if she DOES run for office? What if she wins? What if other people like her win?
* Remove access to healthcare
* Revoke driver's licenses
* Remove access to courts
I agree that while the government doesn't own you, you still operate inside the collective and have obligations towards it.
Of course, this is no reason for facebook to mark you as an extremist.
US doesn't have single payer. You pay for it out of pocket (if it comes from your employer, well you're exchanging service for service instead of service for money).
> Remove access to courts
This would be unconstitutional. In the US you are entitled to a fair trial even if you aren't a citizen.