zlacker

[return to "Justice Department withdraws FBI subpoena for USA Today records ID'ing readers"]
1. dredmo+Lh[view] [source] 2021-06-06 00:58:14
>>lxm+(OP)
In an age where newspapers were bought at news stands for cash, identity of the reader was entirely anonymous.

In an age where printed periodicals were delivered by subscription, the subscriber information was available (and yes, often tracked by local and federal law enforcement), but not the specifics of what articles were read.

Today, with Web-based document delivery and Javascript instrumentation, the specifics of who reads what articles, time on page, sections read, interactions, shares, and more, are available not just to the publishere but advertisers, any entities hacking into or accessing their systems, app developers, and more.

And, yes, law enforcement, whether under warrant, subpoena, or ... other methods.

◧◩
2. simfoo+5L[view] [source] 2021-06-06 08:05:05
>>dredmo+Lh
Actually this track-ability is what is keeping me from subscribing to news websites. I'd easily pay a few bucks to them for the privilege, but I don't want to log-in or identify myself every time I read an article.
◧◩◪
3. chrisr+PN[view] [source] 2021-06-06 08:46:39
>>simfoo+5L
Yeah for this you would need to sign up using a one-use mailbox, pay by mailing in a cashier's check, atop hiding your traffic. Possible with the NY Times, at least.
◧◩◪◨
4. Scound+VQ[view] [source] 2021-06-06 09:40:29
>>chrisr+PN
Why a cashier’s check? Shouldn’t you send in $1 coins (after baking them) and pray that they arrive?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. 1f60c+TU[view] [source] 2021-06-06 10:43:32
>>Scound+VQ
What do you mean by "baking"? Google is unhelpfully showing me results about crypto currencies and how to literally bake coins into a cake.
[go to top]