zlacker

>>lxm+(OP)
So DoJ is like Google or Facebook: They silently do whatever they want until it appears on HN, then they fix it.

>>a3n+2c
The DOJ was trying to catch a child molester. Not sell ads.

>>tootie+Ai
The perp was being investigated for possession of child pornography. While not a saint, he was not a "child molester".

>>zapdri+9j
The trade in child pornography enables child molestation.

I suppose that if we get very technical you're technically correct. Seems like an odd and very pedantic hill to die on though.

>>arp242+Dp
I wouldn't call false accusations of such a serious crime "technical" or "pedantic".

I'd call it "profoundly misleading about a serious matter" at best.