zlacker

[return to "The problem with reinforced concrete (2016)"]
1. idoh+S8[view] [source] 2021-05-25 22:20:03
>>hrl+(OP)
I don't know if it is really a problem, more like a tradeoff. Reinforced concrete costs less and enables shapes that are impossible without it, with the downside that the buildings last 50 years instead of 100+ years. The present value of a building that lasts 50 years is not that much different that the same one that lasts 100 years.

With that in mind, it makes perfect sense to make an office building out of reinforced concrete.

◧◩
2. nerdpo+F9[view] [source] 2021-05-25 22:25:56
>>idoh+S8
> The present value of a building that lasts 50 years is not that much different that the same one that lasts 100 years.

That's a problem in and of itself, IMO. Construction is tremendously resource-intensive. We should not be building "throwaway" buildings.

◧◩◪
3. cle+Ec[view] [source] 2021-05-25 22:43:46
>>nerdpo+F9
Not so straightforward. Sometimes we throw things away to make room for better things.
[go to top]