zlacker

>>pseudo+(OP)
> The Wuhan Institute hasn’t shared raw data, safety logs and lab records on its extensive work with coronaviruses in bats, which many consider the most likely source of the virus.

Nevertheless, the gain of function research with coronaviruses has been documented in the peer-reviewed literature.

The lack of new information from the Wuhan Institute, despite its longstanding research activities, is probably the most compelling evidence in support of the lab escape hypothesis.

If the evidence pointed elsewhere, it would be released. The most likely explanation is that the Institute's fingerprints are all over this thing.

The second most compelling evidence is that to date the reservoir species has not been found.

>>aazaa+Yo1
Can we add?: Why aren't the people behind GoF in Wuhan (from grant funders, to scientists, to CCP) shouting from the rooftops that their research (1) was necessary all along and justified their fight to protect it (2) and can now quickly lead cures and vaccines, as promised?

Instead, nothing. In their perfect moment of glory and justification, they prefer you didn't notice their work.