zlacker

>>pseudo+(OP)
> The Wuhan Institute hasn’t shared raw data, safety logs and lab records on its extensive work with coronaviruses in bats, which many consider the most likely source of the virus.

Nevertheless, the gain of function research with coronaviruses has been documented in the peer-reviewed literature.

The lack of new information from the Wuhan Institute, despite its longstanding research activities, is probably the most compelling evidence in support of the lab escape hypothesis.

If the evidence pointed elsewhere, it would be released. The most likely explanation is that the Institute's fingerprints are all over this thing.

The second most compelling evidence is that to date the reservoir species has not been found.

>>aazaa+Yo1
> The lack of new information from the Wuhan Institute [...] is probably the most compelling evidence in support of the lab escape hypothesis.

or it's just china being 100% opaque about an accident that has already damaged their international reputation, and they're controlling the narrative hard at this point. you know, like they do.