zlacker

>>pseudo+(OP)
Recent related threads:

How I learned to stop worrying and love the lab-leak theory - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27184998 - May 2021 (235 comments)

More Scientists Urge Broad Inquiry into Coronavirus Origins - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27160898 - May 2021 (341 comments)

The origin of Covid: Did people or nature open Pandora’s box? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27071432 - May 2021 (537 comments)

Edit: also these:

Scientists who say the lab-leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV-2 shouldn't be ruled out - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26750452 - April 2021 (618 comments)

Why the Wuhan lab leak theory shouldn't be dismissed - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26540458 - March 2021 (985 comments)

The Lab Leak Hypothesis - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25640323 - Jan 2021 (229 comments)

>>dang+Kl
@dang An hour into this submission, this was flagged despite ~100 upvotes. Was there anything off about the flagging behaviour?

It seemed like a reputed source article of interest to a lot of folks here, so I was surprised.

>>actuat+TC
Anonymous "intelligence sources".... Sounds as legit as the super micro back door.

Meanwhile the actual real people on the WHO team said they investigated and didn't find anything more than seasonal flu.

>>elp+rJ
> Meanwhile the actual real people on the WHO team said they investigated and didn't find anything more than seasonal flu.

The thing is people doesn't trust WHO.

I think people have somewhat good reasons not to trust WHO blindly now.

I can't say however if this is a good or a bad thing.

>>skinke+eK
Yes. You would be excused for trusting WHO a year ago, with lots of good faith.

If you do not share even a small dose of doubt over WHO by now, well I guess we could label it as agree to disagree.