zlacker

>>uptown+(OP)
This reduces the number of reliable and reasonably neutral news sources accessible to the majority of people, which is a bad thing.

>>james-+l9
I would not call Reuters neutral. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters

>>sschue+A9
Gee, I'd always considered Reuters and AP to be as close to neutral press as there is. Who is neutral if not Reuters?

>>wyldfi+V9
Reuters is quite neutral.

Which means the right thinks Reuters is left.