zlacker

[return to "Reuters website goes behind paywall in new strategy"]
1. tyingq+Nb[view] [source] 2021-04-15 14:15:54
>>uptown+(OP)
"audiences prepared to pay $34.99 per month for a deeper level of coverage"

Holy crap...who is this audience? NYT is $4/month, WAPO is $4-6/month, etc.

Edit: Ah, okay, intro pricing that shifts to ~$17/month after a year. Still, though, that's half of this proposed pricing.

◧◩
2. nickle+yg[view] [source] 2021-04-15 14:40:35
>>tyingq+Nb
Although the comparison to NYT/WaPo makes some superficial sense, there is a big difference between a newspaper and a news agency like Reuters or AP.

I don’t know much about the journalism business, but I expect Reuters is catering towards a smaller, premium audience that reads a lot of straight news but doesn’t care so much about criticism, commentary, and so on. In particular: reporters and academics, for whom this will be a business expense.

[go to top]