zlacker

>>uptown+(OP)
This reduces the number of reliable and reasonably neutral news sources accessible to the majority of people, which is a bad thing.

>>james-+l9
I would not call Reuters neutral. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters

>>sschue+A9
Gee, I'd always considered Reuters and AP to be as close to neutral press as there is. Who is neutral if not Reuters?

>>wyldfi+V9
I think they are about as neutral as you will find. The wider environment has just become hyper partisan. It has certainly influenced both organizations (which I read daily), and I would agree they're not as neutral as they were once lauded to be, but I don't know that you'll find a better option.

Checking out allsides.com, and their bias ratings, is a good way to see just how bad the other options are.