zlacker

[return to "Scientists who say the lab-leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV-2 shouldn't be ruled out"]
1. loveis+Oj[view] [source] 2021-04-09 15:24:15
>>todd8+(OP)
Judging by the comments in this thread, it seems a lot of people are still unaware that:

1. Gain of function research primarily uses samples collected from nature, and seeks to stimulate their evolution in as natural a way as possible to learn how viruses evolve in nature. If such viruses were to escape the lab, they would appear "natural"

2. It's not xenophobic for people from the US to suggest the possibility of a lab leak, because the US was itself funding gain of function research on novel coronaviruses in the Wuhan BSL4 lab

3. Lab leaks happen more often than most people realize[1]

[1]https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/3/20/18260669/deadly...

◧◩
2. arctic+UM[view] [source] 2021-04-09 17:34:55
>>loveis+Oj
It's also not xenophobic to suggest the possibility of a lab leak because lab leaks happen regardless of who's doing the research; even at BSL-4 facilities, mistakes are made. And also because there were two separate SARS-CoV-1 leaks/outbreaks from Chinese labs which the PRC admitted to. [1]

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC403836/

◧◩◪
3. refene+LE1[view] [source] 2021-04-09 22:11:02
>>arctic+UM
The fact that this particular theory reaches the front page of hacker news every week, despite zero evidence besides the existence of a lab.. hey, we're just asking questions, here, right?

Frankly, it would be irresponsible NOT to provacatively suggest this thing we have no evidence of, repeatedly.

◧◩◪◨
4. arctic+tM1[view] [source] 2021-04-09 23:09:45
>>refene+LE1
Yes it sure would be irresponsible to ask questions about the...

(1) BSL-3 lab doing bat coronavirus research...

(2) on gain-of-function projects...

(3) one block away from the epicenter of a coronavirus pandemic with bat ties...

(4) that nobody's being allowed into...

(5) when they have a history of coronavirus lab escapes.

I'm not saying we know this is what happened. I'm saying it's not a far-fetched position and there's a lot of experts who agree. I hear there's even an MIT Technology Review write-up about it.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. refene+QN1[view] [source] 2021-04-09 23:21:23
>>arctic+tM1
The write-up specified that they're a noisy minority who disagree with the consensus. In the subheading, after the heading 'scientists say..'. Media!

It's still 100% speculation. The question to ask is, would there be this level of suggestive speculation if it wasn't America's newest top rival?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. arctic+oO1[view] [source] 2021-04-09 23:26:44
>>refene+QN1
Sure, but also, if the PRC didn't have a tendency of murdering it's dissenters and anyone who made them look bad. They're not exactly a shining beacon of transparency. If this was going down in New Zealand I'm not sure anyone would be speculating, and also WHO investigators would have been granted full access to the facility on day 1.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. refene+yQ1[view] [source] 2021-04-09 23:49:22
>>arctic+oO1
And we're up to the nub of it -- lots of people fundamentally think China is evil and this topic is just another battleground.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. voidfu+322[view] [source] 2021-04-10 01:54:10
>>refene+yQ1
The Chinese government is definitely evil by western standards.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. refene+W32[view] [source] 2021-04-10 02:17:57
>>voidfu+322
We're pretty deep into "I support this lab theory for unrelated political reasons", but hey, it's Friday night, I'll get sidetracked.

Their government has more support from their people than ours does -- ours is capped at 50% approval.

So go whole hog or go home. Hair-splitting is for cowards. Either include the people or, if you'd like, you can start wondering why they think that, maybe they have more context and things are more subtle. But you can't think one is black-and-white evil without including the other.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. voidfu+J62[view] [source] 2021-04-10 02:57:02
>>refene+W32
Youd support your government too if it massively raised yours and your neighbors standard of living within a 30-40 year period. The Nazis did that too and were wildly popular.

But evil is evil. And theres a really bad and consistent track record.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
11. refene+872[view] [source] 2021-04-10 03:02:16
>>voidfu+J62
The Nazis were not wildly popular, they were a minority government, and they definitely did not improve material conditions for their people. World War II fucking sucked. They barely held on by being at war, stirring things up against foreign enemies, and getting lucky against assassination attempts. Peace would have ruined them.

The Chinese government is not at war. They are vastly less at-war than the US is. They have no rally-around-the-flag effect and yet their people still like them better than we like our government.

[go to top]