zlacker

[return to "Why the Wuhan lab leak theory shouldn't be dismissed"]
1. gregwe+pV1[view] [source] 2021-03-22 22:00:55
>>ruarai+(OP)
This is a great article explaining why a lab leak should always be a suspect. The alternative theory is that a virus traveled on its own (via bats or other animals) from bat caves 900km away to Wuhan where there are 2 labs researching bats. One of the labs is lesser known but is right next to the seafood market and the hospital where the outbreak was first known. [1]

This article points out that a lab outbreak could have happened in the United States and many places in the world. We need to avoid demonizing China over this if we want to ever find out the truth and learn how to prevent another pandemic outbreak.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https://www.resea...

◧◩
2. nradov+Gi2[view] [source] 2021-03-23 00:15:42
>>gregwe+pV1
An alternative hypothesis is that a human was infected near the bat caves, then traveled to Wuhan and spread it to other humans and animals at the seafood market. There's no specific evidence for that, but we can't rule it out either.
◧◩◪
3. menset+rk2[view] [source] 2021-03-23 00:31:16
>>nradov+Gi2
Roll a dice representing all the locations of possible human bat interactions. How many of those land next to research labs that study this.
◧◩◪◨
4. rssoco+um2[view] [source] 2021-03-23 00:47:57
>>menset+rk2
That's not the correct calculation because you've selected the research lab hypothesis post-facto. The correct calculation is to roll a dice representing all the locations of possible human bat interactions and see how many of those land next to some landmark that you can form some sort of conspiracy about.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. bgandr+jr2[view] [source] 2021-03-23 01:24:30
>>rssoco+um2
And if you add all the sane hypotheses to the equation, how many would that be? 2?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. rssoco+kW3[view] [source] 2021-03-23 14:41:45
>>bgandr+jr2
The only thing that evolves faster than this virus are the conspiracy theory memes[1] that the internet collectively weaves from circumstantial evidence where more and more compelling narratives become more and more widely shared. I'd wager that 100% of pandemics, regardless of origin, will have some compelling conspiracy attached to them. Compelling conspiracy theories is what the internet manufactures, particularly in the absence of direct evidence of anything.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme

[go to top]