zlacker

>>ruarai+(OP)
https://project-evidence.github.io/

I found this to be an extremely engaging read and compelling story.

TLDR; The likelihood of it being lab related is high. The likelihood of it being directly malicious low.

My Take form reading it: The lab in question needed to collect bats for research. A person who collected the bats did so with insufficient safety and is likely patient 0.

>>hayst4+Fy1
Based on your takeaway, I'm looking for this to convince me that it's more likely that it's a researcher caught it first than anyone else handling bats.

>>8note+yP1
There is pretty good evidence for that as well. I think section 9 is most relevant.