zlacker

[return to "Getting Cancelled on HN a Thing?"]
1. aminoz+h1[view] [source] 2021-02-15 22:56:49
>>mmaund+(OP)
Not sure about getting cancelled.

But I recently submitted a link containing an uncomfortable truth from Pew Research titled "U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households".

It got 30 upvotes in one hour, and quickly reached the front page. It seemed to have gotten shadowbanned by a moderator, as it disappeared to the 5th page despite its quickly gained popularity. It was not flagged, or at least not normally as it would show "[flagged]". I suspect someone with special powers demoted it for whatever reason.

This was the post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26100329

◧◩
2. ColinW+i4[view] [source] 2021-02-15 23:13:14
>>aminoz+h1
I suspect it triggered the flame war detector. Search for that and you'll find more information.

It can be flagged without showing "[flagged]". That tag only gets shown when something is flagged to death. Your item wasn't flagged to death because it's still active.

I suspect it's mostly that a sizeable proportion of people on the site decided that it doesn't really fit with the theme and they don't want to see things like that, so they flagged it. That, associated with the large number of comments and comparatively few upvotes caused the "flame war" penalty to apply.

No conspiracies necessary, all explained by the regular dynamics.

◧◩◪
3. dang+O6[view] [source] 2021-02-15 23:29:14
>>ColinW+i4
Yes, it triggered the flamewar detector.
◧◩◪◨
4. ratsma+C8[view] [source] 2021-02-15 23:40:50
>>dang+O6
There's nothing wrong with energetic conversation as long as it remains civil, but I have to guess that your experience is that the incivility comes quicker in these cases though.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. hiq+TR[view] [source] 2021-02-16 08:26:10
>>ratsma+C8
It might not only be incivility but also lower SNR (people replying to each other with the same rehashed arguments) which makes the whole thread less interesting for everyone, including passive readers
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. dang+Zl2[view] [source] 2021-02-16 19:24:02
>>hiq+TR
That's also exactly right. Sometimes we call it the 'overheated discussion detector' for that reason—not every such low-SNR thread is a flamewar.
[go to top]