zlacker

[return to "US raises ‘deep concerns’ over WHO report on Covid’s Wuhan origins"]
1. ttz+rc[view] [source] 2021-02-13 19:17:03
>>lazycr+(OP)
First gen Chinese, grew up in NA. Have contact with relatives "on the ground".

My own experience: Don't ever trust the Chinese government on issues that could potentially involve the reputation of the party. Note that I'm not saying don't trust what CCP says, ever (sometimes they actually do good things) - just not on issues that involve anything to do with how the world might perceive them.

Which is exactly what this issue is about.

That's not to say we have compelling evidence that this was a lab virus, either. I think, for me, it's a, "we don't know, but I wouldn't be shocked at all if it was a lab virus".

◧◩
2. yurlun+w01[view] [source] 2021-02-14 02:05:58
>>ttz+rc
No need for you to preach to the choir about not trusting the Chinese government. As can be seen in the thread, people would much prefer to trust conspiracy theorists and fringe scientists before they put any trust in the Chinese government.

To me, the only constructive discussion that can be had at this point needs to be around actual evidence, and not the absence of it. The first documented cases, first traces of positive samples etc etc. It's clearly still in the early stages of discoveries so all theories are just theories. That said I don't expect this to remain a mystery forever. It will just take time, because eventually the natural origins will be pinned down and reasonable chain of events of first spread will be identified.

◧◩◪
3. fspeec+j41[view] [source] 2021-02-14 02:59:54
>>yurlun+w01
Comments by experts who went on the WHO mission https://mobile.twitter.com/TheaKFischer/status/1360590441817...
◧◩◪◨
4. jgalt2+991[view] [source] 2021-02-14 04:02:11
>>fspeec+j41
Right now, I trust WHO slightly more than I trust CCP. Biden is right to re-engage them, but they have a lot of work to do to get its reputation back.

They can probably start by capping payments from any one country as to minimize the effects of soft power.

An under-funded WHO is better than a biased WHO.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. mcguir+1c1[view] [source] 2021-02-14 04:40:50
>>jgalt2+991
Note that the WHO has very similar problems to the International Red Cross: if they don't play by the rules of the governments in question, they get kicked out and can't do anything. Something is better than nothing, right?

On the other hand, the WHO after the pandemic had clearly emerged continued to appear biased, seriously damaging its reputation.

[go to top]