zlacker

>>benhur+(OP)
You’d think that there’d be a “this person is high profile and any automated bans will cause a stink” flag on accounts to require human review on such decisions, but apparently one of the richer companies in the world just can’t be bothered to hire a few extra people to avoid a PR problem.

That or they’re convinced that they’re this close to fixing the automated system, which they obviously are not.

>>ashton+9d
On the other hand, I'd prefer they fix this process for everyone and not just those with X twitter followers.

I'm completely uninterested in making waves on social media, but I still expect services (whether paid or free) to work as advertised considering I'm not misbehaving. If they don't want me as customer/user, then say so and I'll find another provider.

>>retSav+9n
As an end user, I agree. But Google clearly doesn’t care in the slightest about the end user; if they did we wouldn’t be having this conversation. I’m thinking about this from Google’s own self interest only.