zlacker

[return to "The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News (2019)"]
1. Razeng+1O[view] [source] 2020-11-10 20:33:14
>>bluu00+(OP)
When I first discovered HN, it was like a breath of fresh air compared to Reddit etc.

I have since lost faith.

HN likes to masquerade as some sort of upscale establishment, high and above the petty squabbles of Eslewhere, but in the end this place too devolves into a predictable echo chamber just like the rest of them, when it comes to any topic on which people have varied opinions.

This is not a place for dissenting views (such as this comment). This community does not brook any disagreement, because this service is not designed for it.

This did not happen overnight; for more than a year I have been watching perfectly fine comments getting buried in the gray for not siding with the prevailing mob on divisive topics. Even neutral, soft-spoken stances get struck down.

One can now reliably predict what the majority of comments are going to be like, just by reading the title of a post.

I've brought this up several times with dang, but apparently you're not able to appreciate these problems until you try participating as a regular user.

And let's not even mention the awful UI design with its vendetta against eyes, low light and small screens.

HN is broken, and one of the major indicators of a broken service is a tone-deaf management who continues to insist that everything is Working As Intended.

◧◩
2. westwi+3n2[view] [source] 2020-11-11 11:42:18
>>Razeng+1O
Consider that HN is a tool to measure how dissenting your views actually are with the crowd that you are interacting with.

This is useful in a time where taking some stance can cost you your job or career, even years down the line.

However, it's unfortunate that instead of showing up- and downvotes, negative-scored comments turn grey. There is no distinction between a universally disliked comment and a controversial comment.

[go to top]