zlacker

>>bluu00+(OP)
The one thing I did notice in the article is that there is a a forum dedicated to outrageous things HN says. I mean, I always knew this is a public forum and whatnot, but I thought it has less mainstream appeal, which is the reason the conversation don't devolve easily into name calling if fallacies don't work ( or fallacies are called out for what they are ).

edit: made it more generic

>>A4ET8a+2V
Somewhat ironically that hashtag seems to be dominated by a few people; that being said, they have identified people saying outrageous things.

Probably worth flagging rather than increasing its visibility?

>>alexch+wW
Can you elaborate on identifying people? I typically try to keep things sufficiently vague, but I also do hold somewhat strong opinions on a few subjects.