zlacker

>>aaronb+(OP)
> In 2016, internal analysis at Facebook found 64% of all extremist group joins were due to their own recommendation tools. Yet repeated attempts to counteract this problem were ignored or shut down.

That's pretty damning. Facebook execs knew that extremist groups were using their platform and Facebook's own tooling catalyzed their growth, and yet they did nothing about it.

>>save_f+q8
Well, based on the original quote, it's not that they passively did nothing about it.

The consciously and proactively blocked attempts to fix it.

>>emilse+z9
> attempts to counteract this problem were ignored or shut down.

I think you misinterpreted this?

>>eximiu+ta
Maybe. How do you interpret it?

>>emilse+Bb
Your original statement can be casually read to seem like your disagreeing with OP’s message (that Facebook did not quell extremist groups), due to the structure of your message (a lead statement followed by a delayed contradiction). You could make it clearer with better emphasis that you are stating “agree and” instead of “no because”.