zlacker

[return to "Spinning Up in Deep RL"]
1. _5659+B3[view] [source] 2020-08-17 06:18:05
>>samroh+(OP)
"Pray, who is the candidate's tailor?" -Hilbert

Who is responsible for OpenAI's UI/UX design? It is immaculate and should be the standard for the community. I'm always dazzled by the impeccable standards of OpenAI with regards to tone, presentation, accessibility.

The documentation is both familiar but distinct, an impressive achievement!

I have my own personal qualms on OpenAI's ethics and virtues but am nevertheless impressed by their aesthetics and regard for their publicity. It's always delightful to look at their work.

OpenAI has in my opinion, the most appropriate presentation for their ideas with marketing and branding. It feels exquisitely simple to grasp what goes on here.

I feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI but projects such as this give me hope.

◧◩
2. colord+v4[view] [source] 2020-08-17 06:28:39
>>_5659+B3
I assume this comment is generated? The link is a standard Sphinx doc.
◧◩◪
3. Stavro+1m[view] [source] 2020-08-17 09:49:28
>>colord+v4
I wonder if the fact that we now can't trust anything we read is good or bad. Maybe it'll lead to critically thinking about everything.
◧◩◪◨
4. 6gvONx+b21[view] [source] 2020-08-17 15:38:49
>>Stavro+1m
I suspect it's bad. Any cognitive dissonance and disagreement can be hand waved away as bots, rather than approached critically.

Ever since the 2016 foreign-meddling-in-the-election news, I've see people commenting that there must be tons of russian bots/shills/astroturfers/etc in comments where I see genuine disagreement. I'm sure there are both, but I suspect the dismissal of "'people/opinions' that disagree with me aren't real people/opinions" is more common than the actual act of fake commenting.

[go to top]