Who is responsible for OpenAI's UI/UX design? It is immaculate and should be the standard for the community. I'm always dazzled by the impeccable standards of OpenAI with regards to tone, presentation, accessibility.
The documentation is both familiar but distinct, an impressive achievement!
I have my own personal qualms on OpenAI's ethics and virtues but am nevertheless impressed by their aesthetics and regard for their publicity. It's always delightful to look at their work.
OpenAI has in my opinion, the most appropriate presentation for their ideas with marketing and branding. It feels exquisitely simple to grasp what goes on here.
I feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI but projects such as this give me hope.
That comment indeed looks a lot like it is generated. It has correlated a bunch of words, but it did not understand that the link between UI and AI is tenuous. It is probably one of the few comments where it is so glaringly obvious. There are likely a lot more comments around which are generated but which went unnoticed.
This comment is not generated, as the links below are dated after the GPT-3 dataset was scraped.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=adolos
[1] https://adolos.substack.com/p/what-i-would-do-with-gpt-3-if-...
Would it be possible to use gpt3 to "beautify" existing prose without changing its meaning? Now that would be useful!