zlacker

>>samroh+(OP)
"Pray, who is the candidate's tailor?" -Hilbert

Who is responsible for OpenAI's UI/UX design? It is immaculate and should be the standard for the community. I'm always dazzled by the impeccable standards of OpenAI with regards to tone, presentation, accessibility.

The documentation is both familiar but distinct, an impressive achievement!

I have my own personal qualms on OpenAI's ethics and virtues but am nevertheless impressed by their aesthetics and regard for their publicity. It's always delightful to look at their work.

OpenAI has in my opinion, the most appropriate presentation for their ideas with marketing and branding. It feels exquisitely simple to grasp what goes on here.

I feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI but projects such as this give me hope.

>>_5659+B3
I assume this comment is generated? The link is a standard Sphinx doc.

>>colord+v4
I wonder if the fact that we now can't trust anything we read is good or bad. Maybe it'll lead to critically thinking about everything.

>>Stavro+1m
Could you ever?

>>comboy+6n
I meant in the specific sense of trusting the basic humanity of HN, not the general veracity of the internet at large.

>>Stavro+An
I would want to say that comments should be judged solely on their content, but yes, "redis works for us" is a different message from an account that you know is CTO at some big corp instead of some random one.

Web of trust is inevitable either way. I just hope it won't be owned by any huge company. Most likely it will be practically shared by a few of them, like the Internet or web standards.

After playing some with GPT-3 though I noticed I work a lot of like it though. Unrelated comments about web of trust are a great example.

Also, dude, I see you in almost every comment thread, how do you consume HN? Some clever scripts or lots of tabs and lots of refreshing?