zlacker

[return to "Spinning Up in Deep RL"]
1. _5659+B3[view] [source] 2020-08-17 06:18:05
>>samroh+(OP)
"Pray, who is the candidate's tailor?" -Hilbert

Who is responsible for OpenAI's UI/UX design? It is immaculate and should be the standard for the community. I'm always dazzled by the impeccable standards of OpenAI with regards to tone, presentation, accessibility.

The documentation is both familiar but distinct, an impressive achievement!

I have my own personal qualms on OpenAI's ethics and virtues but am nevertheless impressed by their aesthetics and regard for their publicity. It's always delightful to look at their work.

OpenAI has in my opinion, the most appropriate presentation for their ideas with marketing and branding. It feels exquisitely simple to grasp what goes on here.

I feel comfortable saying that the biggest obstacle in progress for AI is UI but projects such as this give me hope.

◧◩
2. colord+v4[view] [source] 2020-08-17 06:28:39
>>_5659+B3
I assume this comment is generated? The link is a standard Sphinx doc.
◧◩◪
3. Findet+I5[view] [source] 2020-08-17 06:44:39
>>colord+v4
And now we're going to need a turing test captcha.
◧◩◪◨
4. slavik+x8[view] [source] 2020-08-17 07:19:36
>>Findet+I5
I'd be more worried about bots gaming the voting. I'm perfectly happy to share this website with intelligent machines if they make insightful comments.

Whether odomojuli's post was written by a human, robot or dog is rather immaterial. It's the content of the post that makes it good or bad. It can be evaluated without knowing the author.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. odysse+Ya[view] [source] 2020-08-17 07:43:33
>>slavik+x8
Perhaps this will keep us on our toes. I tend to find something more believable if it's presented in nice prose (the AI's forte) -- which is really not how I should be evaluating information.
[go to top]