zlacker

[return to "Ask HN: How to stave off decline of HN?"]
1. tptace+o[view] [source] 2011-04-03 20:14:16
>>pg+(OP)
A hard ban on politics and current events, instead of the wiggly one we have in the site guidelines now.
◧◩
2. pg+h1[view] [source] 2011-04-03 20:24:46
>>tptace+o
The problem with that is that it's hard to say exactly what counts as politics. E.g. is an article about economic inequality like this one

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2402027

politics? I don't think so. Economic inequality is a very interesting social phenomenon, though it is often written about in a heated/political way.

◧◩◪
3. Zev+o3[view] [source] 2011-04-03 20:42:20
>>pg+h1
politics? I don't think so. Economic inequality is a very interesting social phenomenon, though it is often written about in a heated/political way.

The comments should count as much as the articles do in determining if a particular topic is allowed on HN or not. Because the comments are just as important. To me, at least.

A big part of why I first started reading HN is the the comments in the articles. I could find the articles in half a dozen other places. Still can. But, the comments here aren't usually anywhere else.

And the best comments are typically better than the article itself. If the comments turn political and into people arguing politics with one another, thats not interesting to me anymore. I don't usually find the article being commented on to be very good, and the comments are even worse.

Seeing people argue politics just makes me close HN and find something else to use to kill the next few minutes. I've actually avoided reading articles that I likely would have otherwise found interesting just to avoid seeing the vitriolic comments that inevitably follow.

[go to top]