>>Xordev+(OP)
I guess this is the reason lot of corporates try to stay out of politics. Because once you set a precedence then people will use that as to push their own political agendas. I personally don't like the slippery slope argument since it's very lazy and justifies inaction in many cases. But at the same time when I see news like this, I just wonder how long it will take two different subgroups trying push their own conflicting agendas and how the company should react in such a case.
>>johnce+bg
One side gets de-humanized and shown the door. I'll let you guess which side that is.
This is why I think good people prefer a-political companies.
It is sad, that there are people who have commitments/families, and they are taken hostage by this.
>>PascLe+9n
This must clearly be an oversight, since "good people"—one would hope—think about how their words and actions might impact others, and work to address those impacts in an open and vulnerable way free from judgment.
I'm sure they just can't edit the post because it's been too long.