zlacker

[return to "Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone"]
1. conroy+fz1[view] [source] 2020-06-11 23:32:43
>>obilgi+(OP)
A friend lives in Seattle and texted me today about his visit last night:

> I was there last night and it's such a cool pseudo utopian place

> The media coverage of it is WILD

> People on the internet are convinced it's protected by armed guards and people are dying of hunger and instead its...like a music festival campground

> There are speakers, musicians, art walls. I took a group pic for a bunch of black guys last night and they were so proud of what was built because they felt like they fought for it, which in a sense, they did.

◧◩
2. pera+gF1[view] [source] 2020-06-12 00:30:01
>>conroy+fz1
> The media coverage of it is WILD

I live 7 blocks away from "the zone" and can confirm, I have never in my life seen anything alike in this regard. The scale of the misinformation being spread in social networks and news media reached a level I couldn't believe possible before. Seriously, it's beyond absurd.

If anyone is interested, I have been taking some pictures of the ongoing protests (including a few of the zone): https://www.flickr.com/photos/peramides

◧◩◪
3. drevil+IP2[view] [source] 2020-06-12 13:49:24
>>pera+gF1
Seattle police chief said on TV [1] that "Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we're not able to get to [them]."

Doesn’t sound very utopian

[1] https://twitter.com/mrandyngo/status/1271291958296604675?s=2...

◧◩◪◨
4. iron00+2d3[view] [source] 2020-06-12 16:11:20
>>drevil+IP2
How, after all the events of the last two weeks, is anyone still willing to take a police-person’s word as truth?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Fellsh+wo3[view] [source] 2020-06-12 17:11:05
>>iron00+2d3
Because some people are still rational enough to treat individuals on an individual basis.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. shadow+Et3[view] [source] 2020-06-12 17:40:29
>>Fellsh+wo3
If that means people are taking the SPC's word as truth because they have priors she's generally truthful, that's sensible.

If people are taking the SPC's word as truth because they have priors that cops are truthful, that's an invalid prior based on how much general lying recent events have demonstrated cops do.

If people are taking SPC's word as truth because they have no priors, that's bias to authority and people should probably employ more skepticism.

Do we have any evidence that the Seattle police chief is generally truthful?

[go to top]