zlacker

[return to "Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incident report"]
1. mjevan+z4[view] [source] 2020-06-11 03:10:30
>>evo_9+(OP)
This deserves state and/or federal investigations...

EDIT:

Contrast: In Washington State, an investigation about the death in Tacoma a couple months ago was just this mentioned in a news conference by the governor. Due to conflicts of interest the state is currently evaluating who can be assigned to lead a fully independent and unbiased investigation, with new announcements expected in the next few days.

◧◩
2. newacc+O4[view] [source] 2020-06-11 03:14:13
>>mjevan+z4
The Louisville PD and the FBI have both announced investigations and the officers involved are on paid leave. Historically, that hasn't generally produced much in the way of prosecutions. Maybe in the current climate things will be different.
◧◩◪
3. mchusm+46[view] [source] 2020-06-11 03:29:27
>>newacc+O4
The concept of paid leave has always puzzled me. This would be my choice of punishment if I am ever given a choice.
◧◩◪◨
4. throwg+Ma[view] [source] 2020-06-11 04:37:39
>>mchusm+46
there was a comment posted by rayiner that was quickly deleted

>It’s a Constitutional (and undoubtedly contractual) requirement. Police officers are employed pursuant to a contract. A contractual benefit is considered a property interest that cannot be taken away without “due process.” Hence police officers remain employed (and getting paid) until an investigation establishes they actually did something wrong. Private employers don’t need to provide due process so this doesn’t apply.

probably deleted because it's wrong; deleted before i could submit my response:

>It’s a Constitutional (and undoubtedly contractual) requirement.

you're wrong

> “Property interests, of course, are not created by the Constitution. Rather, they are created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law—rules or understandings that secure certain benefits and that support claims of entitlement to those benefits.”

so it's a matter of “legitimate entitlements”. in fact "legislature may elect not to confer a property interest in federal employment" and moreover in Bishop v. Wood SC accepted a lower court's opinion that police are employed at will even if discharge is conditional on due process.

all this and more at https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-14/...

[go to top]