zlacker

>>illumi+(OP)
The speech-to-text transcription is so incredibly wrong that it's almost dangerous to publish it like this.

For instance:

> at the beach view new screen for assistance there is a needle in his hand he's foaming from his mouth throwing off this item

What the officer actually said on the radio:

> He was going to Rainier Beach area. A request for assistance to approach two people with needles. <operator>: Call was from a neighbor in the area.

>>VWWHFS+9g
It would be cool if there was a way to listen for a bit and feed some corrected transcriptions back in to help train the algorithm better

>>ghostp+Ki
Yeah, live transcripting is one of those jobs that can be easily done remotely, at scale, and crowdsourced; if one sentence is transcripted by two or three people, you can do error correction / checking as well (or just show the different interpretations). Transcripts for radio comms are important because they can be used in legal proceedings. Same with e.g. bodycam footage.

>>Cthulh+SM
You cant use crowd sourced transcript for legal proceedings if original audio was not recorded. It would be too easy to be poisoned by bad actors doing intentionally bad transcripts.

>>watwut+A21
I guess it would be considered hearsay at that point