zlacker

[return to "Protests about police brutality are met with wave of police brutality across US"]
1. swarni+O1[view] [source] 2020-06-07 09:46:52
>>miles+(OP)
Considering i've seen armies less well equipped then your police force and civilian population i think its a miracle the shooting hasn't started yet.

Y'all ever considered gun control or is that taboo? Maybe if you weren't all armed like you're going to a Texan wedding your law enforcement wouldn't have to be as well?

◧◩
2. Camper+r2[view] [source] 2020-06-07 09:58:36
>>swarni+O1
Y'all ever considered gun control or is that taboo?

"The police are completely out of control. They're basically a street gang funded by tax dollars. Officers with dozens of complaints are sent back to the streets with almost literal carte blanche to run roughshod over minorities without a trace of accountability. Their propensity for violence and escalation has practically torn our entire country in half, while prosecutors look the other way and city officials stand by helplessly. Also, they should have all the guns."

Makes perfect sense. /s

◧◩◪
3. swarni+C2[view] [source] 2020-06-07 10:00:57
>>Camper+r2
Because you militarised them.

I'm sure walking 2 steps further down the wrong road will eventually get you to the right place.

Also i thought the point of the 2nd amendment was so you could rise up and overthrow a tyrannical government. Go shoot some cops and let me know how that works out. I'll wait.

◧◩◪◨
4. dragon+a4[view] [source] 2020-06-07 10:19:25
>>swarni+C2
US uniformed police services started out as ethnic gangs made into paramilitary forces to suppress other ethnic gangs in the urban north and slave patrols in the rural south. The problem does not have its roots in recent militarization, and has been constant for the whole history of police forces in this country.

Shifting political preferences among the enfranchised have caused it to be a source of greater tension in the electorate, and changes in media have made it more visible, but it's not a new problem.

> Also i thought the point of the 2nd amendment was so you could rise up and overthrow a tyrannical government

The point of the 2nd Amendment was so that the people could be the security services and there would not be a need for standing military and paramilitary external and internal services (beyond small cadres to form a nucleus for the mobilized militia) which, in the founders view, inevitably led to tyranny. It was for prevention on a model that was abandoned though the amendment remains, not for response.

[go to top]