zlacker

>>dredmo+(OP)
Free speech balances delicately, and that should be debated vigorously, but it should not be treated as an absolute.

You shouldn't be free to incite violence. Nor should a company help that speech spread.

>>tarkin+a7
> "You shouldn't be free to incite violence. Nor should a company help that speech spread."

only the fringiest of fringes argue for absolutes. everyone (else) is arguing about where the line is drawn. for instance, if we take yours at face value, you'd be arguing against the american revolution.

>>clairi+j8
Many self-described free speech advocates here also draw the line at inciting violence.