zlacker

>>epista+(OP)
I feel like some upfront setting of expectations would really, really be helpful here. If you're planning to arrest people after curfew, explain that in clear terms: "Our curfew is at 8pm, so we will start asking groups to disperse at 7:30. At 8pm, no large assemblies will be permitted, and police will begin arresting people in large groups at that time. We understand some people will engage in civil disobedience, and if they are cooperative with the police, they will be arrested peacefully. If any protesters start taking action that endangers police (e.g. throwing bricks or running at police unexpectedly), they will be met with force and arrested. Because it can be difficult for police to determine the perpetrator of violence, additional crowd control tactics such as tear gas may be used, so we strongly encourage you to self-police and prevent any violence towards police. After 8pm there will be a 30 minute grace period for those who are not gathered in groups but are in the process of heading home. At 8:30pm, anyone who remains on the street will be detained."

I think it would really help both in terms of outcomes as well as the perception of police if they gave this kind of clear description of what's going to happen. As it stands now, the curfews aren't enforced with any kind of regularity, so they just cause confusion.

>>awille+t8
A better way to set expectations would be to not equip the cops with riot and war gear face shields, batons, tear gas etc. Equip them with cargo shorts, dad style new balance shoes, and polo shirts. The police should be there to deescalate, not escalate. There are a lot of studies that show that "the uniform makes the man" and by outfitting someone in war gear, they are primed to "go to war". It sounds insane, but in the 70s, menlo park changed their police uniforms from the standard issue to suit and tie, and not only did incidents of officer involved violence go down by like 50%, but citizen on citizen violence also went down by like 30%. The reality is, the people have a right to peacefully assemble, so setting expectations that the cops are going to beat the shit out of people in a peaceful assembly is morally wrong and unconstitutional.

>>0xB31B+Kc
Another thing to point out about gear specifically that doesn't seem to be getting talked about:

All of those full face respirators the cops are wearing would also work great for healthcare workers, who are still dealing with COVID-19. Specifically anything with pink cartridges has a P100 particulate filter, the highest level of filtration (99.97% vs N95 95%). When you see a picture of cops wearing or holding respirators, you should think of the nurses, EMTs, and vulnerable people that have been deprived of that PPE, just so the cops don't have to think about which direction the wind is blowing before they open fire on peaceful protestors.